A study from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Children’s Hospital in Boston has shed new light on the properties of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells), reporting evidence that they may not be able to replace embryonic stem cells in some research and medical applications. Their conclusion is that research using both types of pluripotent human stem cells is crucial. Read More
- Home
- Learn About TAMR
- Stem Cells
- Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cell Primer
- What are Stem Cells?
- What is the difference between Adult and Embryonic Stem Cells
- What is Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer – SCNT?
- What are induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells?
- What is the Role of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in Producing Stem Cells?
- What Can We Learn from Embryonic Stem Cells that We Cannot Learn from Adult or iPS Cells
- Myths vs. Facts
- Supporters of Stem Cell Research
- Links Regenerative Medicine
- Ethics
- Economic
- Video & Media
- News
- Be An Advocate
- Support TAMR
- Contact Us
Follow us on
Fast Facts about Stem Cell Research
- What are Stem Cells?
- What is the difference between Adult and Embryonic Stem Cells
- What is Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer – SCNT?
- What are induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells?
- What is the Role of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in Producing Stem Cells?
- What Can We Learn from Embryonic Stem Cells that We Cannot Learn from Adult or iPS Cells